Yutan
Yutan @yutaaaalll ·
Replying to @yutaaaalll
①Claude Code Reviewはトークン課金なので、diff量が大きいPRほど高くつく。小さなリファクタPRを量産するチームだと逆にコスパ良い可能性もある。②結局「何をAIに任せて何を人間が見るか」の線引き設計が重要で、全PR丸投げは現実的じゃない。 #AI #ClaudeCode #CodeReview
21
Yutan
Yutan @yutaaaalll ·
PR1件$15-25、安く見えるけど月200PR回すチームだと$3,000-5,000。人間のレビュアーの方が安い場合も普通にある。コスト構造ちゃんと見ないとAIレビュー導入が裏目に出る。 #AI #ClaudeCode #CodeReview
CG CG @cgtwts ·
when you realize code review might soon cost more than hiring an engineer. >anthropic priced claude code review at about $15–25 per PR. sounds cheap at first. but across dozens or hundreds of PRs, the costs stack up quickly. ai code review could get expensive fast.
1
34
The Serious CTO
The Serious CTO @TheSeriousCTO ·
Most devs now use AI, but juniors 'vibe code' without understanding. This leads to broken production and ignored stack traces, boosting code review times by 91%. Seniors are fixing AI errors instead of teaching. #AIDevelopment #CodeReview
13
Mukunda Katta
Mukunda Katta @katta_mukunda ·
Your PRs deserve better than just linting. Valkyrie is an AI-powered code review agent that catches security issues, logic bugs, and architectural concerns before they hit production. Built with Python + TypeScript. Open source. github.com/MukundaKatta/v… #CodeReview #AI #Security #DevTools
GitHub - MukundaKatta/valkyrie: Valkyrie — AI Code Review Agent. AI-powered code review agent

Valkyrie — AI Code Review Agent. AI-powered code review agent - MukundaKatta/valkyrie

From github.com
25
The Prompt Smith
The Prompt Smith @PromptSmithAI ·
Replying to @PromptSmithAI
Same technique crushes for code review. Instead of: "Review this PR" Stage 1: Summarize intent Stage 2: Check security Stage 3: Assess error handling Stage 4: Verify edge cases Stage 5: Rate confidence GPT-5.3 catches 3x more issues this way. #CodeReview #SoftwareEngineering #AI
1
7
MLBridge
MLBridge @mlbridgeAI ·
Code review stats this month: Every PR reviewed before merge. No exceptions. Why: fresh eyes catch things the author can't. A bug caught in review costs 10 minutes. A bug caught in production costs days. #CodeReview #Quality #MLBridge
2
Cenk Tokgöz
Cenk Tokgöz @cenktk ·
AI ile kod yazmak roket gibi… ama delivery niye yavaşladı? 🚀 Sorun: “code review darboğazı”. Kod dakikalarda çıkıyor, doğrulama/entegrasyon saatler-günler. Çözüm hız değil, daha akıllı denetim. Sizde durum ne? #AI #CodeReview #YazılımM
1
22
The Prompt Smith
The Prompt Smith @PromptSmithAI ·
Replying to @PromptSmithAI
Code review RAG prompt (GPT-5.3): "Retrieved PR context: {similar past reviews + codebase chunks} Review this diff: [paste diff]. 1. Check security vulns. 2. Error handling. 3. Suggest refactors. Stay grounded in retrieved info." Catches ghosts humans miss. #CodeReview #RAG #DevWorkflow
1
9
Vitalize Contexts
Vitalize Contexts @vitalizeone ·
GitHub's Copilot coding agent can now modify existing pull requests when mentioned, fixing tests and addressing code reviews without creating new PRs. (Read More) dlvr.it/TRhDRw #GitHub #Copilot #CodeReview #PullRequests #SoftwareDevelopment
GitHub Copilot Now Edits Pull Requests Directly via @mention

GitHub's Copilot coding agent can now modify existing pull requests when mentioned, fixing tests and addressing code reviews without creating new PRs.

From blockchain.news
15
The Prompt Smith
The Prompt Smith @PromptSmithAI ·
Replying to @PromptSmithAI
Code review from raw PR comments: "From these comments: 1. Summarize changes + praises. 2. Categorize issues (security/perf/bugs). 3. Rank by severity. Brief as bullet list." Then: "Write PR feedback email from brief, tone: constructive." Catches what scrolls by. #CodeReview #DevTools
1
3