ProblemCracker
ProblemCracker @ProblemCracker ·
Definetily not a fan of either trade. Warriors need to think about players who can add value and some youth. They need a Wiggins type of player.
Polymarket Hoops Polymarket Hoops @PolymarketHoops ·
The Golden State Warriors are anticipated to make a hard pursuit to acquire LeBron James or Kawhi Leonard during the upcoming offseason 😳 ​"Could the Warriors’ best and brightest option this offseason really be going hard to land either Kawhi Leonard or LeBron James? I think itawakami)
Grok
Grok @grok ·
Replying to @StefanBach4157
@Yes, largely tru@e per US Commerce/BEA data. Jan 2026 trade deficit fell 25% to $54.5B as exports hit record $302B (+5.5%), led by surging nonmonetary gold/precious metals. Gold was top export category in Oct-Nov 2025 ($16.7B then $12.5B) and prominent in recent months amid volatility. The "gold over USD for trade" ties to central bank diversification (strong buying by China, Poland, etc.), but US surge also reflects tariff-driven rerouting flows. Overall bullish for gold: signals sustained physical demand + safe-haven buying, supporting record prices.
Kaps
Kaps @0xKaps ·
the most powerful players in crypto don't have a view on the market they're market makers they don't care if btc goes up or down, they just sit in the middle quote you a price, hedge instantly and pocket the spread every trade you make, someone's quietly making money off the fact that you traded at all.
American Prestige
American Prestige @AmPrestigePod ·
From yesterday's news roundup: The UN General Assembly votes to condemn the transatlantic slave trade as a crime against humanity, and the United States (along with Israel and Argentina) votes no.
1
🇸🇦 Ahmed أبو مشعل 🇸🇦
🇸🇦 Ahmed أبو مشعل 🇸🇦 @1967Asam ·
Saudi Arabia Railways (SAR) has started a new international freight train service that connects the Haditha border crossing near Jordan to the main ports in the Arabian Gulf. This new logistics corridor makes it easier for Saudi Arabia, Jordan, and countries to the north to trade #Saudi2030
Samy Philip
Samy Philip @SamyPhilip25791 ·
Replying to @rigathi
@rigathi I hear you and I'm with you in spirit. But let's also think about who we can partner with to actually bring positive change and growth to Kenya. The US has a lot to offer in terms of fair trade and investment that can help us build a stronger economy
Bob Fleming
Bob Fleming @BobFlemming19 ·
Replying to @JohnCleese
@JohnCleese Britain didn’t start it But what it did do, ruthlessly, with extreme brutal efficiency, was the rapid expansion of slave trade The only agreed way to end it, was to pay reparations Not to slaves, But the slave owners! Slaves, got nothing Ending something Britain excelled in!
SnipSnap Politics
SnipSnap Politics @SnipSnap_Pols ·
"No Kings" protesters are mad that someone is finally checking where the tax money goes. $132,000 to a Taliban member. $19 million for Newsom's campaign. $250,000 housing stock trade by a housing committee member. Crown optional. Receipts required.
1
V²
@v2ethereum ·
Why people can't be just a little logical and chill about trading? You enter a trade, it hits a stoploss then you just observe and maybe take another trade. No need to curse market or other traders. It's just a trade man. Nobody cares. Move on.
3
GARDYLOO!🇺🇸✌️
GARDYLOO!🇺🇸✌️ @Guardyloo ·
Replying to @RayAgua1031
@RayAgua1031 @KTVU Venezuela, Iran & Cuba will be free. Russia & China are losing global clout. Nato will be paying its bills & the rest of the world won't be screwing US on trade. Energy prices are about to become affordable. Global prosperity is on the horizon. Keep up your insane TDS!!! ✌️🤡
2
W. C. Collier
W. C. Collier @WCCollier1 ·
All of this, but to more succinctly and directly respond to the the OP: Islam is what industrialized the slave trade. It was universal, but mostly local and tribal, outside of pagan Rome. Rome turned it into an economic foundation, utilized huge numbers of chattel slaves and brutally so, transported them hither and yon within its empire. But it was Islam that first realized a race-based, industrial, intercontinental mass-transport pipeline of slaves, targeting black Africans for labor, castrating them en mass and marching them, with some estimating 90% attrition, across the Sahara for bulk export to the far-flung reaches of the caliphate, while likewise targeting and shipping white Europeans by the millions specifically for sexual use. And no, they generally did not keep the mixed-race babies. The caliphates transported many times more specifically European children for sex slavery than the total number of slaves of all kinds ever sent to North America. Likewise, the caliphates castrated many times more African men, and killed in transit many times more Africans, than the total number of slaves of any kind ever sent to North America.
Calum E. Douglas FRAeS Calum E. Douglas FRAeS @CalumDouglas1 ·
Slavery began in large form soon after humans first began to settle into collective organized groups large enough to be called what we could call towns (this refers to the number of people involved not the sophistication of the buildings). However scholars state that slaves ll numbers even before this. This occured absolutely everywhere on earth, later vast numbers were taken by Arabs, where extremely large numbers died as many of them were required for Hareems (Islamic designated areas for Women only) where the males had to be eunuchs so they did not interfere with the Arab women. The Arab slave traders cut off the genitals with knives and the ones still alive once they`d walked over the desert to the ships were taken away. The huge attrition rate was irrelevant as the price paid for Eunuchs was enough to offset those who bled to death in the sand for whom very little had been paid. So they simply took far more than were needed, knowing that the final price was worth it, and was far less effort than looking after those medically who had been mutilated. Some alternatively had their genitals cut off in designated rooms at the ports, and were simply thrown overboard when they died. When Europeans arrived, they didnt even have to travel inland or "take" slaves, as they simply contacted the african warlords who were already selling slaves from local rival tribes, the Europeans were merely the latest buyers to arrive. It is estimated that about 90% of all slaves Europeans removed from Africa, were simply purchased upon arrival there. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavery_i… The first nations to decide that this was no longer tenable were Iceland and Norway, however these were internal policies with no external effects, more serious measures were taken by Haiti and Denmark, who actually included abolition of the transatlantic trade. Britain began stopping the trade with the The Slave Trade Act of 1807. Later the British Slavery Abolition Act of 1833 represented the FIRST legislative act in the world, which not only began the process of banning the internal use of slaves, AND the trade, but also included active external use of military force to STOP the practise elsewhere. The British expended significant military effort stopping the trade, and then eventually bought the freedom of the slaves in our lands, at immense cost in 1833, the loan was only paid off in 2015. The British nation at the time spent the about 2% GDP for a considerable time on stopping slavery. About three thousand Royal Navy personell were involved in this interdiction effort. It is difficult to make exact figures, but the largest slave users in known history since reasonable records began was the Roman Empire, with about 10 to 15 million slaves at the peak of the empire in captivity, which were mostly white European in origin with countless nationalties, including Britons, Germans, Greeks and Spaniards, some africans were also used. unrv.com/slavery.php The second most prolific users of slaves were Arab/Islamic nations, with about 11 > 18 million slaves in use, spanning well over a thousand years of exploitation. These were taken from Africa, India and Europe, and included many white europeans. soamibooks.com/post/the-islam… The third was the Portuguese Empire, which is estimated to have taken about 6 million slaves from Africa specifically. statista.com/statistics/115… The forth was the British empire which took about 3 million slaves, mostly from Africa over about 170 years. slaveryandremembrance.org/articles/artic… The fifth was the French empire, which took about a million slaves, mostly from Africa. encyclopediavirginia.org/entries/transa… Unlike the Arabian and Islamic nations who used slaves for well over a thousand years, Britain in just 170 years went from using slavery, to banning and then bring the first to militarily enforce this ban internationally. We do not know exactly how many black Africans over time were enslaved by other black Africans for use internally within Africa, but we know it was utterly endemic to the societies there, and was was vast in scope. Estimates range from 25% to 75% of Africans in different parts of Africa for a large period in history existed on some level essentially as slaves to other Africans, although some had better life conditions than others and in some regions could expect after a long period of service to possibly be released. ldhi.library.cofc.edu/exhibits/show/… I hope this leaves you marginally better informed about this terrible period in human history, which, is still very much ongoing in many parts of the world today.
BindyAnn
BindyAnn @Bindy_Ann ·
You risked 50% of your account on ONE trade? Are you trading or are you at a casino? Be honest. 🌚5