Is there any Anglican who really believes that Col. 2:13–15 is the basis for a transactional model of atonement? Seriously? And what about the forgiveness of transgressions, yes, forgiveness, because equivalent compensation or payment, even if in both cases by a third party, is not juridically forgiveness at all? What about the handwriting, the record of debt set down in decrees, the promissory note that stood against us, which was torn up and annulled, and therefore not paid or satisfied? What about the principalities and powers that were disarmed by the Cross that tore up that record? Where exactly does any of this support Satisfaction or Penal Substitution? Even Irenaeus of Lyons, I do not recall the exact passage off the top of my head, uses Epistle to the Colossians 2:13–15 within a Christus Victor framework. There’s no getting around this, folks, there really isn’t.