@steeletalk They have yet to sign a single trade pact. The MOU’s they’re signing are nothing more than a vague, soft commitment to talk again at some point
Search
@Mayo_Slurper12 @TCBScans It's all smoke and mirrors they haven't been "strong" for decades the legends/tales hold the power. With out strong vessels to control imu is nothing more than a stepping stone that will get folded in half by luffy and loki only to make a pact with the real threat blackbeard.
'Saudi pact becoming a problem for us': Why Pak wants to host US-Iran peace talks
4
@xadeejourno 1: Cash starved economy will remain cash starved.
2: County internally polarized
3: War with Afghanistan which could bite us for the foreseeable future
4: defense pact with KSA is evaporation
5: If the war goes on we will feel the brunt of it more than anyone else
@Osint613 So Zalensky signs a pact with the people supplying Russia with drones to attack Ukraine ?!
3
A source from Pakistan to FT: “The Saudi pact is becoming a problem for us. It was supposed to be cash for deterrence. But we’ve not gotten any new Saudi investments, and deterrence failed.”
5
@Hebro_Steele I honestly don't know how we are supposed to live like this. It's a completely masochistic worldview, devoid of anything resembling basic self-preservation. It's a suicide pact masquerading as virtue.
1
8
@Beyeffendi23 pact with Pakistan? also plz. keep in mind, Saudi Foreign Minister met Indian counterpart today and after that MBS held a phone call with Modi
5
@Is this source telling the truth, or are they setting the stage for a withdrawal? 🧐 Leaking to the Financial Times is a classic way for the Pakistani military establishment to signal to Riyadh and Washington that they are at the limit of their endurance. By claiming the pact is a problem, Islamabad is likely trying to negotiate better terms essentially saying, If you want us to stay in this fight, the cash needs to start flowing now. However, the risk is that by admitting deterrence failed,they may permanently damage their standing as a regional security provider, leaving them isolated if the war spreads to their own 900km border with Iran
67
@Beyeffendi23 But bhai, Pakistan has a defence pact with Saudi Arabia, So instead of asking Pakistan to provide it's expertise & tech (Pakistani & Chinese) to counter drone & missile threat, Saudia has signed a separate pact with Ukraine. Is this a step towards departure from the defence 👇
1
9
@Choyaa13 @irish_news I agree re Feeney.
The others don't need a transfer pact.
They already transfer between each other.
Something like 80%
Unionists only transfer to unionists as well.
That's high 90's.
3
@StateDept If France starts a war with for example, Morocco, we are not obligated to join. Obviously. Its a defensive pact stupid.
1
1
1
@The nature of the Pakistan–Saudi Strategic Mutual Defence Agreement (SMDA) is often subject to overstatement. While Pakistan remains a steadfast and trusted strategic partner, it is important to clarify that Saudi Arabia has not invoked the pact. This relationship is rooted in a long-standing brotherly alliance rather than a mere transactional arrangement
#saudia #pakistan #پیپلز_پارٹی_چور_ہے #ISACAKenyaConference
4
@Osint613 Pakistan expected a “cash-for-deterrence” deal with Saudi Arabia. Money in exchange for strategic security support, but neither happened: no new Saudi investments and the deterrence didn’t work, leaving the pact ineffective.
89
A source from Pakistan to FT: “The Saudi pact is becoming a problem for us. It was supposed to be cash for deterrence. But we’ve not gotten any new Saudi investments, and deterrence failed.”
1
@ayeshaijazkhan @clashreport @saadmohseni In next few days denial will come from weaker partner which is Pak. Then Western news outlets will publish this story from INNER CIRCLE sources and finally Trump will announce it innocently in some gathering.
Infact defence pact is more liability than opportunity for Pak
1