If God was finished with Israel and Jerusalem in 70 AD with the destruction of the temple, as many say, and moved on to a “gentile Christian church,” shouldn’t He have chosen a new name for the future kingdom instead of calling it “The New Jerusalem”?
Isn’t that, in a sense, strikingly Israel centered?
It’s a glaring contradiction in many Christian circles.
The reality is that Israel remains Israel, and Jerusalem remains Jerusalem. Both undergo cleansing when the Messiah comes again.
This takes place at the end of the age, what the Torah and the Prophets call “Jacob’s Distress,” and it is followed by the millennial reign of Jesus when He returns to the earth and makes Jerusalem new.
In that day the Branch of the LORD will be beautiful and glorious, and the fruit of the earth will be the pride and adornment of the survivors of Israel. It will come about that he who is left in Zion and remains in Jerusalem will be called holy, everyone who is recorded for life in Jerusalem. When the Lord has washed away the filth of the daughters of Zion and purged the bloodshed of Jerusalem from her midst, by the spirit of judgment and the spirit of burning, then the LORD will create over the whole area of Mount Zion and over her assemblies a cloud by day, even smoke, and the brightness of a flaming fire by night. For over all the glory there will be a canopy. There will be a shelter to give shade from the heat by day, and refuge and protection from the storm and the rain.
— Isaiah 4:2–6
That is the New Jerusalem.
It is not your church. It is not something internal. It is not symbolic. It is real, in time and space, in the future, in the very place Jerusalem stands today.
There is deep hope in that. It is tangible. You do not have to reinterpret the Scriptures. You can read them plainly and trust them.
He will fulfill every stroke and every letter of the Law and the Prophets, just as He has promised.