Jopy25
Jopy25 @Jopy252 ·
Materials science being useful in mechanical and civil like structural engineering I guess makes me think of chemistry and chemical engineering and just like a lot of matter is related to chemistry even if it’s not exactly the same I guess
Science Simplified
Science Simplified @Scivf4 ·
How train change their track? This close-up footage reveals one of the most satisfying engineering moments most people never get to see — the exact instant a train wheel passes through a railroad switch and smoothly changes onto a different track without stopping.
1
Boyuan (Nemo) Chen
Boyuan (Nemo) Chen @boyuan_chen ·
Replying to @kevinma_dev_zh
@kevinma_dev_zh 关键是给Codex做review的prompt怎么写。单纯'review这段代码'效果一般,但把项目的coding conventions、已知的技术债、还有改动意图一起喂进去,review质量直接从'变量名不好'升级到'这个设计跟架构冲突'。Subagent只是管道,prompt engineering才是核心。
1
@HassenHh296674
@HassenHh296674 @HassenHh2966741 ·
Replying to @Israa_Alfass
@Israa_Alfass My alarm bells been ringing loudly: - $38T debt, $60T liabilities, $6T assets - Ponzi scheme economy - very little full supply chain industrial engineering - productivity off the backs of labor not automation - 40%+ of Americans taking cash out from HELOC - rampant corruption
Hercules Strong 🇺🇦
Hercules Strong 🇺🇦 @hercAICN ·
Replying to @magamuss
@magamuss @OpenSourceZone True. SLIGHTLY more Republicans go into engineering than Democrats. I’m not sure why you started talking about money, but doctors and lawyers make more money than engineers. YOU said Democrats are uneducated, and everyone else on this planet says that is simply not true.
1
Stephan
Stephan @Sevens_2 ·
Replying to @Sevens_2
@papapreuss Wären Sie ehrlich über die erforschten Präferenzen von Frauen - Teilzeit, stay-at-home, gerade mit kleinen *eigenen Kindern* - könnten Sie sich ihre Poserposse noch mehr sparen. Sie papageien unreflektiert social engineering.
1
Jopy25
Jopy25 @Jopy252 ·
I probably won’t discuss the civil and mechanical as much as chemical or computer engineering applications I guess comes to mind to some extent
1
D
D @wyzeart ·
Engineering >
2
Jopy25
Jopy25 @Jopy252 ·
But I guess the business and engineering applications are useful for making this stuff a little more interesting I guess comes to mind to some extent
1
Francis Ford Crappola
Francis Ford Crappola @FrancisCrappola ·
Replying to @oiler3535
@oiler3535 @MickWest From what I’ve read I don’t think they are ET specifically. I favor a hypothesis that they are advanced human civilizations that have mastered spacetime metric engineering, as it is the only way the observed characteristics are possible in General Relativity, but don’t know.
2
The Communists
The Communists @CPGBML ·
Trump inspires… ridicule, mostly. But he is also engineering the final downfall of Anglo-American imperialism. Victory to Iran!
20
Jopy25
Jopy25 @Jopy252 ·
These physics and engineering applications can get a little subjective in some cases actually I guess is the impression I get like engineering is kind of related to design and there’s some creativity there I guess is the impression I get
2
CureShot
CureShot @CureShot9 ·
Replying to @Jarvay_
@we, $KAS$KAS "clowns" just do not think $BTC is a world class solution for anyone who believes scaling (where system performance stays constant regardless of the number of users) is not a myth and that 7 transactions per second could be considered "the peak of human engineering". p.s. The de
8
How D heck
How D heck @HowDheck ·
The construction project took 579 years 1386 to 1965. With modern technology and engineering, we can do it in 30 years. Today’s world is purely profit-driven. We no longer value timeless wonders; we only chase quick returns. No company, government, or group would ever build something like this again, because it simply wouldn’t make money or turn in profit.
Redd Redd @ReddCinema ·
Why did humans stop building wonders?
Akash Muni
Akash Muni @akashmuni27 ·
This is a prompt engineering problem more than an AI problem. If the AI is writing code that takes 3 hours to debug, the context you gave it was not specific enough and you did not review the output before running it. The developers getting value from AI are the ones who treat it like a fast junior who needs clear instructions and code review. Not a magic box that removes the need to think.
Wise Wise @trikcode ·
AI writes your code in 30 seconds. You spend 3 hours debugging what it wrote. You could have written it yourself in 45 minutes. But that would require thinking and we don't do that anymore apparently.