@Literally the @whole text of “motivation” makes It very clear it is a standard you are setting for Cardano governance as a whole.
Putting that aside, The fact that an MBO is making this an onchain vote, rather than an ekklesia vote between the parties it affects tells it all Nicolas.
I spent most people of what Intersect is and what it is not, because Charles did a great job positioning it mentally in people’s minds as something it is not. (Before he teared half of it down)
This info action is an “on the top process”and terms that intersect want to set for anyone wanting to use them in the process.
This is a matter between Intersect/its members and potential Proposers. Not Dreps or the wider ecosystem.
By putting this needlessly on chain, it is obvious you are trying to set standards for Dreps to demand as a standard, that you know only intersect can currently deliver, but are not needed.
You are introducing something right now that will (like vision2030) be used to try and sway Dreps into voting in your favour because of a vote that only existed to be a tool to weaponise.
You may be good at what you do Nicolas, but I am good at what I do, and I spend most of my time smelling when bullshit or power plays are put in front of me and I need to figure out the true motivation.
The whole thing is unnecessary if not an attempt to co-opt Dreps into applying this ecosystem wide.